New Year, New Policies
-
bookmark
-
print
Starting off the first week of 2022, it is safe to say that only a rarified few had circled the FOMC Minutes as the main event. But the scribblings from three weeks earlier landed with a great thud on financial markets, sending a clarion call that the game had truly changed. Yes, we have had plenty of warnings in the past month, from Chair Powell’s assertion that Omicron heightened, not lowered, inflation risk, to Governor Waller’s warning that the March meeting was “live” (which St. Louis President Bullard was only too happy to agree with this week). And, of course, there was the Fed’s own projections from the—now infamous—December FOMC meeting, which looked for three rate hikes this year. But the new news in the Minutes was that many members are already openly discussing running down the balance sheet (i.e., quantitative tightening), and with some haste. This clearly signals that the Fed is now deeply concerned about the inflation backdrop, shifting from “transitory” to trepidation in a matter of weeks.
Doing nothing to soothe those mounting concerns, oil prices have staged a spectacular recovery after a brief swoon when the news on Omicron first emerged six weeks ago. After quietly powering higher in the holiday week, WTI rose another 5% this week to around $80, or essentially back to mid-November levels. That’s up from as low as $65 a month ago, a fast rebound which will soon reverse any temporary relief in some headline price metrics. (For example, U.S. gasoline prices dipped roughly 3% last month, which will help contain CPI…somewhat. We still expect next week’s key CPI to print 7% on the headline rate and a hot 5.3% on core.)
Then there is the December jobs report, which felt uncannily similar to the prior month’s release. Again, the headline print fell well shy of expectations at 199,000. But, again, that’s where the bad news ended, as the report was replete with big upward revisions to earlier months and contained a big gain in the companion household survey (jobs up 651,000). The latter helped chop the unemployment rate yet again to just 3.9%. While the big gap in payroll and household job tallies may raise some eyebrows, note that the latter may just be playing catch-up—for all of 2021, both saw monthly average gains of more than 500,000.
The theme of a tightening job market was reinforced by the record level of quits reported earlier in the week (a staggering 4.5 million, or a 3% rate), as well as 10.6 million open jobs (versus now just 6.3 million officially unemployed). As a result, wages continue to simmer. Perhaps the most notable surprise in the jobs data was the piping hot 0.6% rise in average hourly earnings last month. While this actually trimmed the yearly pace to 4.7% (from 5.1%), it will provide the Fed with precisely zero comfort. Recent trends in wages are heading due north, with earnings rising at above a 6% clip since the summer.
The double punch of robust wages and a plunging jobless rate kept the flame flickering on bond yields, even with the dud headline payroll rise. As of mid-morning Friday, it was the middle part of the curve that took the heaviest hit this week, with 5-year yields sprinting 24 bps to around 1.5%, while 10s jumped 25 bps to just above 1.75%—rivalling the highs hit last March. The move in yields has mostly been in real rates, not inflation expectations, with the Fed’s hawkish vibe leading the charge. Markets are now pricing in a reasonable chance of a March rate hike, and—while we expect them to start a bit later—nothing can be ruled out, given the abrupt pivot by the Fed in recent weeks. We remain comfortable calling for three rate hikes, but readily recognize the risks of more and earlier.
Where does this leave the Bank of Canada? Well, it’s complicated. On one side, the Bank has been signaling greater concern on the inflation front for longer and was well ahead of all others on winding down QE. But, on the other side, the restrictions on the Canadian economy are much more intense, with both Ontario and Quebec stepping in with aggressive new measures this week to stem the wave of new Omicron infections. While it was partly predictable that Canada would see deeper restrictions, the degree is surprising, prompted by a sudden rise in hospitalization rates in the past week. By some measures, Canada is now facing some of the most intensive restrictions in the world, aside from some locked down cities in China. At the very least, this will skewer activity in January, and could lead to a repeat of last spring when the economy stepped back for a full quarter (GDP fell at a 3.2% a.r. in Q2 following restrictions in Ontario and elsewhere). It’s possible this wave of closures is briefer, albeit more widespread.
But complicating matters for the BoC is that it is clear that the economy had powerful momentum heading into year-end—and, by extension, could rebound quickly again when this wave of restraints passes. To wit, employment easily cruised above modest expectations last month, rising by a sturdy 54,700, powered by a hefty 122,500 jump in full-time positions. Combined with a strong trade report for November (overcoming the B.C. floods), it now looks like GDP will easily surpass our prior call of 4.5% in Q4. Sectors less affected by restrictions (e.g., construction and manufacturing) led the way, and even the hospitality sector saw only a small dip in jobs last month. The market tightened further, with the jobless rate dipping a tick to 5.9%, although a back-up in January is expected. As well, in contrast to the U.S., wages remain mild, as average hourly pay was up a calm 2.7% y/y. Canada’s participation rate is back to normal, with the core age group at a record high, helping contain wage pressures.
And then there is housing—and, for Canada, it always seems to come back to housing. Sales remained firm in December in most major cities, and prices continued to rip, in an extremely tight market. For example, the HPI benchmark index soared 31% y/y in the Toronto region, matching the height of the 2016/17 froth, when policymakers stepped in with a suite of measures to cool the market. While many assert that BoC policy should not be aimed at a specific sector like housing, the reality is that soaring home prices will both seep into the official inflation stats as well as keep a blazing fire under inflation expectations. Moreover, the persistent strength in housing is a clear symptom of a bigger theme—ultra-loose policy has caused widespread asset price inflation, which has become too much of a good thing. No doubt, the Fed has arrived at the same conclusion (finally) in recent weeks.
On balance, even with the expected short-term plunge in activity around the turn of the year, we suspect that this will not meaningfully affect the timing on potential BoC rate hikes. True, a January hike looks like an extreme long shot (even as the market continues to price in reasonable odds of such), but policymakers could be opening the door for rate rises as soon as that meeting—with the timing ultimately dependent on how soon the current COVID wave crests. We continue to circle the April meeting for the first rate increase; then, expect them to move with some haste, especially if it is apparent that activity is rapidly recovering from the current restrictions.
Douglas Porter
Chief Economist and Managing Director
416-359-4887
Douglas Porter has over 30 years of experience analyzing global economies and financial markets. As Chief Economist at BMO Financial Group and author of the popular…(..)
View Full Profile >Starting off the first week of 2022, it is safe to say that only a rarified few had circled the FOMC Minutes as the main event. But the scribblings from three weeks earlier landed with a great thud on financial markets, sending a clarion call that the game had truly changed. Yes, we have had plenty of warnings in the past month, from Chair Powell’s assertion that Omicron heightened, not lowered, inflation risk, to Governor Waller’s warning that the March meeting was “live” (which St. Louis President Bullard was only too happy to agree with this week). And, of course, there was the Fed’s own projections from the—now infamous—December FOMC meeting, which looked for three rate hikes this year. But the new news in the Minutes was that many members are already openly discussing running down the balance sheet (i.e., quantitative tightening), and with some haste. This clearly signals that the Fed is now deeply concerned about the inflation backdrop, shifting from “transitory” to trepidation in a matter of weeks.
Doing nothing to soothe those mounting concerns, oil prices have staged a spectacular recovery after a brief swoon when the news on Omicron first emerged six weeks ago. After quietly powering higher in the holiday week, WTI rose another 5% this week to around $80, or essentially back to mid-November levels. That’s up from as low as $65 a month ago, a fast rebound which will soon reverse any temporary relief in some headline price metrics. (For example, U.S. gasoline prices dipped roughly 3% last month, which will help contain CPI…somewhat. We still expect next week’s key CPI to print 7% on the headline rate and a hot 5.3% on core.)
Then there is the December jobs report, which felt uncannily similar to the prior month’s release. Again, the headline print fell well shy of expectations at 199,000. But, again, that’s where the bad news ended, as the report was replete with big upward revisions to earlier months and contained a big gain in the companion household survey (jobs up 651,000). The latter helped chop the unemployment rate yet again to just 3.9%. While the big gap in payroll and household job tallies may raise some eyebrows, note that the latter may just be playing catch-up—for all of 2021, both saw monthly average gains of more than 500,000.
The theme of a tightening job market was reinforced by the record level of quits reported earlier in the week (a staggering 4.5 million, or a 3% rate), as well as 10.6 million open jobs (versus now just 6.3 million officially unemployed). As a result, wages continue to simmer. Perhaps the most notable surprise in the jobs data was the piping hot 0.6% rise in average hourly earnings last month. While this actually trimmed the yearly pace to 4.7% (from 5.1%), it will provide the Fed with precisely zero comfort. Recent trends in wages are heading due north, with earnings rising at above a 6% clip since the summer.
The double punch of robust wages and a plunging jobless rate kept the flame flickering on bond yields, even with the dud headline payroll rise. As of mid-morning Friday, it was the middle part of the curve that took the heaviest hit this week, with 5-year yields sprinting 24 bps to around 1.5%, while 10s jumped 25 bps to just above 1.75%—rivalling the highs hit last March. The move in yields has mostly been in real rates, not inflation expectations, with the Fed’s hawkish vibe leading the charge. Markets are now pricing in a reasonable chance of a March rate hike, and—while we expect them to start a bit later—nothing can be ruled out, given the abrupt pivot by the Fed in recent weeks. We remain comfortable calling for three rate hikes, but readily recognize the risks of more and earlier.
Where does this leave the Bank of Canada? Well, it’s complicated. On one side, the Bank has been signaling greater concern on the inflation front for longer and was well ahead of all others on winding down QE. But, on the other side, the restrictions on the Canadian economy are much more intense, with both Ontario and Quebec stepping in with aggressive new measures this week to stem the wave of new Omicron infections. While it was partly predictable that Canada would see deeper restrictions, the degree is surprising, prompted by a sudden rise in hospitalization rates in the past week. By some measures, Canada is now facing some of the most intensive restrictions in the world, aside from some locked down cities in China. At the very least, this will skewer activity in January, and could lead to a repeat of last spring when the economy stepped back for a full quarter (GDP fell at a 3.2% a.r. in Q2 following restrictions in Ontario and elsewhere). It’s possible this wave of closures is briefer, albeit more widespread.
But complicating matters for the BoC is that it is clear that the economy had powerful momentum heading into year-end—and, by extension, could rebound quickly again when this wave of restraints passes. To wit, employment easily cruised above modest expectations last month, rising by a sturdy 54,700, powered by a hefty 122,500 jump in full-time positions. Combined with a strong trade report for November (overcoming the B.C. floods), it now looks like GDP will easily surpass our prior call of 4.5% in Q4. Sectors less affected by restrictions (e.g., construction and manufacturing) led the way, and even the hospitality sector saw only a small dip in jobs last month. The market tightened further, with the jobless rate dipping a tick to 5.9%, although a back-up in January is expected. As well, in contrast to the U.S., wages remain mild, as average hourly pay was up a calm 2.7% y/y. Canada’s participation rate is back to normal, with the core age group at a record high, helping contain wage pressures.
And then there is housing—and, for Canada, it always seems to come back to housing. Sales remained firm in December in most major cities, and prices continued to rip, in an extremely tight market. For example, the HPI benchmark index soared 31% y/y in the Toronto region, matching the height of the 2016/17 froth, when policymakers stepped in with a suite of measures to cool the market. While many assert that BoC policy should not be aimed at a specific sector like housing, the reality is that soaring home prices will both seep into the official inflation stats as well as keep a blazing fire under inflation expectations. Moreover, the persistent strength in housing is a clear symptom of a bigger theme—ultra-loose policy has caused widespread asset price inflation, which has become too much of a good thing. No doubt, the Fed has arrived at the same conclusion (finally) in recent weeks.
On balance, even with the expected short-term plunge in activity around the turn of the year, we suspect that this will not meaningfully affect the timing on potential BoC rate hikes. True, a January hike looks like an extreme long shot (even as the market continues to price in reasonable odds of such), but policymakers could be opening the door for rate rises as soon as that meeting—with the timing ultimately dependent on how soon the current COVID wave crests. We continue to circle the April meeting for the first rate increase; then, expect them to move with some haste, especially if it is apparent that activity is rapidly recovering from the current restrictions.
What to Read Next.
Outlook 2022: Recovery or Relapse?
Douglas Porter | December 20, 2021 | Economic Insights
In preparation for the annual look-ahead, it’s normally a useful exercise to also look back to a year ago, in order to see where the ship may h…
Continue Reading>More Insights
Tell us three simple things to
customize your experience.
Contact Us
Banking products are subject to approval and are provided in the United States by BMO Bank N.A. Member FDIC. BMO Commercial Bank is a trade name used in the United States by BMO Bank N.A. Member FDIC. BMO Sponsor Finance is a trade name used by BMO Financial Corp. and its affiliates.
Please note important disclosures for content produced by BMO Capital Markets. BMO Capital Markets Regulatory | BMOCMC Fixed Income Commentary Disclosure | BMOCMC FICC Macro Strategy Commentary Disclosure | Research Disclosure Statements.
BMO Capital Markets is a trade name used by BMO Financial Group for the wholesale banking businesses of Bank of Montreal, BMO Bank N.A. (member FDIC), Bank of Montreal Europe p.l.c., and Bank of Montreal (China) Co. Ltd, the institutional broker dealer business of BMO Capital Markets Corp. (Member FINRA and SIPC) and the agency broker dealer business of Clearpool Execution Services, LLC (Member FINRA and SIPC) in the U.S. , and the institutional broker dealer businesses of BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc. (Member Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization and Member Canadian Investor Protection Fund) in Canada and Asia, Bank of Montreal Europe p.l.c. (authorised and regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland) in Europe and BMO Capital Markets Limited (authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority) in the UK and Australia and carbon credit origination, sustainability advisory services and environmental solutions provided by Bank of Montreal, BMO Radicle Inc., and Carbon Farmers Australia Pty Ltd. (ACN 136 799 221 AFSL 430135) in Australia. "Nesbitt Burns" is a registered trademark of BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc, used under license. "BMO Capital Markets" is a trademark of Bank of Montreal, used under license. "BMO (M-Bar roundel symbol)" is a registered trademark of Bank of Montreal, used under license.
® Registered trademark of Bank of Montreal in the United States, Canada and elsewhere.
™ Trademark of Bank of Montreal in the United States and Canada.
The material contained in articles posted on this website is intended as a general market commentary. The opinions, estimates and projections, if any, contained in these articles are those of the authors and may differ from those of other BMO Commercial Bank employees and affiliates. BMO Commercial Bank endeavors to ensure that the contents have been compiled or derived from sources that it believes to be reliable and which it believes contain information and opinions which are accurate and complete. However, the authors and BMO Commercial Bank take no responsibility for any errors or omissions and do not guarantee their accuracy or completeness. These articles are for informational purposes only.
This information is not intended to be tax or legal advice. This information cannot be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer. This information is being used to support the promotion or marketing of the planning strategies discussed herein. BMO Bank N.A. and its affiliates do not provide legal or tax advice to clients. You should review your particular circumstances with your independent legal and tax advisors.
Third party web sites may have privacy and security policies different from BMO. Links to other web sites do not imply the endorsement or approval of such web sites. Please review the privacy and security policies of web sites reached through links from BMO web sites.
Notice to Customers
To help the government fight the funding of terrorism and money laundering activities, federal law (USA Patriot Act (Title III of Pub. L. 107 56 (signed into law October 26, 2001)) requires all financial organizations to obtain, verify and record information that identifies each person who opens an account. When you open an account, we will ask for your name, address, date of birth and other information that will allow us to identify you. We may also ask you to provide a copy of your driver's license or other identifying documents. For each business or entity that opens an account, we will ask for your name, address and other information that will allow us to identify the entity. We may also ask you to provide a copy of your certificate of incorporation (or similar document) or other identifying documents. The information you provide in this form may be used to perform a credit check and verify your identity by using internal sources and third-party vendors. If the requested information is not provided within 30 calendar days, the account will be subject to closure.