In-house vs. Third Party: The Implications of Upgrading Your Tech
-
bookmark
-
print
- Keywords:
- technology
- strategy
- growth
When integrated properly into your organization, technology can be a competitive advantage as well as an essential part of your business’ growth strategy. But incorporating new technology doesn’t come without certain financial and operational implications.
We spoke with Claudette McGowan, BMO Financial Group’s head of Technology Service Engagement, to discuss those implications. She explains why minimizing those risks involves understanding what you’re trying to accomplish, incorporating the tools you need to accomplish those goals and the best practices for making technology a part of your growth plan.
SUSAN WITTEVEEN: People tend to get excited about bringing new technology to their business, but they don’t always think about what that really means. What’s the first thing you should think about?
CLAUDETTE MCGOWAN: The choice basically comes down to whether to build your own systems or access what you need from a third-party provider. That’s true whether you’re introducing new technology or upgrading your current systems to keep pace with your company’s growth.
How do you make that determination?
First, you need to understand what skills are readily available within your organization, and what skills are not. Also understanding where you are today from a technology perspective. Are there manual tasks that can be automated? Are there systems in place that you’ve outgrown? Once you work out those issues, you can start to determine the best way to incorporate technology into your business.
What are some of the considerations you need to keep in mind if you decide to build out your technology in-house?
On the plus side, you have complete control over your systems, including where your data resides and who has access to what information. But that’s only effective if you have the appropriate security and access policies in place to begin with. Also, depending on your situation, the financial burden could impact your ability to act on other opportunities that may arise.
And what about using external technology partners? What should you keep in mind?
The main advantage is speed. Not having to build your own internal systems may speed up the upgrade process, so your organization can be ready to capitalize on new opportunities.
But also realize that you may no longer have control over where your data resides, which can be a huge security risk if you’re not careful. Also, if any technical issues arise, you may have to wait for your technology provider to resolve it. And any delays can negatively impact your efficiency, which can in turn impact your relationships with your customers. That’s why performing due diligence up front is so important.
So what kind of due diligence should you undertake before making a decision?
Before partnering with an outside provider, many companies include an RFP that details certain non-negotiable requirements, such as a security and vulnerability assessment to make sure your priorities are aligned.
Also, you need to know your partners aren’t doing anything that would put your business in jeopardy. If your tech vendor is working with 20 other companies, you need to make sure your information isn’t going to end up in the hands of one of those other companies.
So that goes back to the principle of knowing your customers’ customers.
Exactly. Which is why you regularly evaluating your technology partners is so important. That could be weekly, monthly, quarterly -- whatever is most appropriate for you.
What’s the one issue that you find comes up the most when a company looks to incorporate technology?
Sometimes you’ll discover a particular technology is great for one part of your organization but not for the organization as a whole. But it’s critical that you implement solutions that work for the majority of users and are aligned with the goals of the organization.
Leslie Anderson, Senior Vice President and U.S. Head of Business Banking Treasury and Payment Solutions for BMO Commercial Bank, contributed to this article.
Susan Witteveen
Senior Vice President & Head, Treasury & Payment Solutions
416-643-4549
Susan Witteveen is an accomplished executive within the financial industry across North America, having spent over 20 years in a variety of leadership roles. …(..)
View Full Profile >When integrated properly into your organization, technology can be a competitive advantage as well as an essential part of your business’ growth strategy. But incorporating new technology doesn’t come without certain financial and operational implications.
We spoke with Claudette McGowan, BMO Financial Group’s head of Technology Service Engagement, to discuss those implications. She explains why minimizing those risks involves understanding what you’re trying to accomplish, incorporating the tools you need to accomplish those goals and the best practices for making technology a part of your growth plan.
SUSAN WITTEVEEN: People tend to get excited about bringing new technology to their business, but they don’t always think about what that really means. What’s the first thing you should think about?
CLAUDETTE MCGOWAN: The choice basically comes down to whether to build your own systems or access what you need from a third-party provider. That’s true whether you’re introducing new technology or upgrading your current systems to keep pace with your company’s growth.
How do you make that determination?
First, you need to understand what skills are readily available within your organization, and what skills are not. Also understanding where you are today from a technology perspective. Are there manual tasks that can be automated? Are there systems in place that you’ve outgrown? Once you work out those issues, you can start to determine the best way to incorporate technology into your business.
What are some of the considerations you need to keep in mind if you decide to build out your technology in-house?
On the plus side, you have complete control over your systems, including where your data resides and who has access to what information. But that’s only effective if you have the appropriate security and access policies in place to begin with. Also, depending on your situation, the financial burden could impact your ability to act on other opportunities that may arise.
And what about using external technology partners? What should you keep in mind?
The main advantage is speed. Not having to build your own internal systems may speed up the upgrade process, so your organization can be ready to capitalize on new opportunities.
But also realize that you may no longer have control over where your data resides, which can be a huge security risk if you’re not careful. Also, if any technical issues arise, you may have to wait for your technology provider to resolve it. And any delays can negatively impact your efficiency, which can in turn impact your relationships with your customers. That’s why performing due diligence up front is so important.
So what kind of due diligence should you undertake before making a decision?
Before partnering with an outside provider, many companies include an RFP that details certain non-negotiable requirements, such as a security and vulnerability assessment to make sure your priorities are aligned.
Also, you need to know your partners aren’t doing anything that would put your business in jeopardy. If your tech vendor is working with 20 other companies, you need to make sure your information isn’t going to end up in the hands of one of those other companies.
So that goes back to the principle of knowing your customers’ customers.
Exactly. Which is why you regularly evaluating your technology partners is so important. That could be weekly, monthly, quarterly -- whatever is most appropriate for you.
What’s the one issue that you find comes up the most when a company looks to incorporate technology?
Sometimes you’ll discover a particular technology is great for one part of your organization but not for the organization as a whole. But it’s critical that you implement solutions that work for the majority of users and are aligned with the goals of the organization.
Leslie Anderson, Senior Vice President and U.S. Head of Business Banking Treasury and Payment Solutions for BMO Commercial Bank, contributed to this article.
What to Read Next.
The Next Step: Liquidity or Legacy?
Henry Munez | November 12, 2018 | Business Strategy
In our discussions with clients and prospects, we try to encourage business owners to focus on where they are in the lifecycle of their business. Are…
Continue Reading>Related Insights
Tell us three simple things to
customize your experience
Banking products are subject to approval and are provided in Canada by Bank of Montreal, a CDIC Member.
BMO Commercial Bank is a trade name used in Canada by Bank of Montreal, a CDIC member.
Please note important disclosures for content produced by BMO Capital Markets. BMO Capital Markets Regulatory | BMOCMC Fixed Income Commentary Disclosure | BMOCMC FICC Macro Strategy Commentary Disclosure | Research Disclosure Statements
BMO Capital Markets is a trade name used by BMO Financial Group for the wholesale banking businesses of Bank of Montreal, BMO Bank N.A. (member FDIC), Bank of Montreal Europe p.l.c., and Bank of Montreal (China) Co. Ltd, the institutional broker dealer business of BMO Capital Markets Corp. (Member FINRA and SIPC) and the agency broker dealer business of Clearpool Execution Services, LLC (Member FINRA and SIPC) in the U.S. , and the institutional broker dealer businesses of BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc. (Member Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization and Member Canadian Investor Protection Fund) in Canada and Asia, Bank of Montreal Europe p.l.c. (authorised and regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland) in Europe and BMO Capital Markets Limited (authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority) in the UK and Australia and carbon credit origination, sustainability advisory services and environmental solutions provided by Bank of Montreal, BMO Radicle Inc., and Carbon Farmers Australia Pty Ltd. (ACN 136 799 221 AFSL 430135) in Australia. "Nesbitt Burns" is a registered trademark of BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc, used under license. "BMO Capital Markets" is a trademark of Bank of Montreal, used under license. "BMO (M-Bar roundel symbol)" is a registered trademark of Bank of Montreal, used under license.
® Registered trademark of Bank of Montreal in the United States, Canada and elsewhere.
™ Trademark of Bank of Montreal in the United States and Canada.
The material contained in articles posted on this website is intended as a general market commentary. The opinions, estimates and projections, if any, contained in these articles are those of the authors and may differ from those of other BMO Commercial Bank employees and affiliates. BMO Commercial Bank endeavors to ensure that the contents have been compiled or derived from sources that it believes to be reliable and which it believes contain information and opinions which are accurate and complete. However, the authors and BMO Commercial Bank take no responsibility for any errors or omissions and do not guarantee their accuracy or completeness. These articles are for informational purposes only.
Bank of Montreal and its affiliates do not provide tax, legal or accounting advice. This material has been prepared for informational purposes only, and is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for, tax, legal or accounting advice. You should consult your own tax, legal and accounting advisors before engaging in any transaction.
Third party web sites may have privacy and security policies different from BMO. Links to other web sites do not imply the endorsement or approval of such web sites. Please review the privacy and security policies of web sites reached through links from BMO web sites.
Please note important disclosures for content produced by BMO Capital Markets. BMO Capital Markets Regulatory | BMOCMC Fixed Income Commentary Disclosure | BMOCMC FICC Macro Strategy Commentary Disclosure | Research Disclosure Statements