There’s Good News in Retail. Can it Last?
-
bookmark
-
print
- Keywords:
- e-commerce
In the middle of a phone call with the CFO of a middle market prospect in the retail sector, my jaw dropped at his casual reference to 25% positive comparative store sales in January. The following week a client that has been drawn into the line of credit for two years told me they’ve paid off the revolver in full. Updates awash in positivity have become somewhat of the norm.
I suppose my surprise began earlier in the year at an industry conference targeted to equity capital and M&A for retail and consumer. Companies large and small, coast to coast, furniture and footwear, hard goods and home goods, specialty retail and, yes, even apparel, presented surprising updates of strong holiday sales and improving liquidity. Is it sustainable? Conversations since then suggest yes, it is.
As I sit here today, my mind wants to conclude that the sector I’ve called home for the better part of the last 20 years was bound for more disruption, significant restructuring activity and an equal, if not higher, number of retailer bankruptcies in the first quarter of 2021. As a lender, I find myself in an odd position where my days are full of activity, while fielding calls from my restructuring community friends wondering why it’s so slow out there.
Don’t get me wrong, there is still ample trepidation in financing retail and consumer products companies. Our memories are short, but not that short. 2020 raised many difficult conversations—from how to underwrite a loan to a company that hasn’t opened its doors in four months, to how to liquidate one that will never open its doors again. However, most of my days over the past three months have been filled with video conference or phone calls different from those through much of 2020. So, I started to piece together the puzzle of what to believe about sustainability and why the positivity may last.
A new balancing act
We’ve all heard the quick reactions and initiatives that took hold at the start of the shutdown last year. In retail, companies seemed to operate with advice from a hotline every CFO had access to, advising them to furlough employees, defer rent, cut purchases and invest in online capabilities. All of them did so with abundant success. Eventually, though, the other shoe will drop, right? That is, rent payments will come due; furloughs will end, and companies will have to staff up. Meanwhile, e-commerce investment and inventory control measures are now well entrenched in how companies operate. Well, yes and no.
According to Forbes, more than 12,000 store closures resulted in 159 million square feet of emptied retail space last year.1 Yet, overall retail industry sales eclipsed $4 trillion in 2020, a staggering 7% increase over 2019, including a 44% increase in e-commerce-related revenue.2
Constant supply chain disruption marked the beginning of COVID-19-related challenges, while out-of-season inventory, particularly in the apparel industry, might have been one of the toughest hurdles of the year. Though margins are hard to quantify for the industry as a whole, by most accounts overall gross margins in 2020 were only down slightly compared with 2019.
A reasonable conclusion is that the amount of discounting that was necessary to achieve revenue growth was balanced by the cost efficiencies of operating a new hybrid business model as the shutdown turned into the new normal. Many believe this new way of operating is sustainable as long as companies maintain the disciplined buying behaviors and cost controls that the past year necessitated.
With respect to personnel, one report I read suggested less than 40% of furloughed workers were expected to regain their positions. I think that figure is impacted by the inclusion of industries that have yet to recover close to the levels as some retail subsectors, such as restaurants.
While over 300,0003 of the nearly 2 million retail industry workers who were furloughed happened in a single day in March 2020, reports emerged throughout the year of others adding to their headcount. The jury remains out on whether retailers can sustain smaller workforces compared to pre-pandemic levels, or if many furloughed workers migrated to other industries or even within retail to companies more diversified than a bricks-and-mortar only offering.4
Moving forward
I don’t know if it’s possible to draw conclusions about the sustainability of this positive information flow. Could revenue increases in 2020 be a direct result of consumers spending discretionary income on things other than travel and entertainment? Could margin enhancement be entirely due to restructuring or deferred payments of leases or reduced personnel costs? Both are possible.
What is certain is that the world since March 2020 taught many companies in the retail industry how to be patient, where to invest dollars that make the most sense, how to balance staffing needs, where the customer prefers to shop and how to market to them, and how to stock the right products on the shelves, either physically or virtually.
Those are all valuable lessons not just for surviving the economic effects of the pandemic, but for operating as a leaner, more agile business as the industry moves toward a new normal.
1 Forbes
Michael Ganann
Head of Retail Finance, BMO Financial Group
In the middle of a phone call with the CFO of a middle market prospect in the retail sector, my jaw dropped at his casual reference to 25% positive comparative store sales in January. The following week a client that has been drawn into the line of credit for two years told me they’ve paid off the revolver in full. Updates awash in positivity have become somewhat of the norm.
I suppose my surprise began earlier in the year at an industry conference targeted to equity capital and M&A for retail and consumer. Companies large and small, coast to coast, furniture and footwear, hard goods and home goods, specialty retail and, yes, even apparel, presented surprising updates of strong holiday sales and improving liquidity. Is it sustainable? Conversations since then suggest yes, it is.
As I sit here today, my mind wants to conclude that the sector I’ve called home for the better part of the last 20 years was bound for more disruption, significant restructuring activity and an equal, if not higher, number of retailer bankruptcies in the first quarter of 2021. As a lender, I find myself in an odd position where my days are full of activity, while fielding calls from my restructuring community friends wondering why it’s so slow out there.
Don’t get me wrong, there is still ample trepidation in financing retail and consumer products companies. Our memories are short, but not that short. 2020 raised many difficult conversations—from how to underwrite a loan to a company that hasn’t opened its doors in four months, to how to liquidate one that will never open its doors again. However, most of my days over the past three months have been filled with video conference or phone calls different from those through much of 2020. So, I started to piece together the puzzle of what to believe about sustainability and why the positivity may last.
A new balancing act
We’ve all heard the quick reactions and initiatives that took hold at the start of the shutdown last year. In retail, companies seemed to operate with advice from a hotline every CFO had access to, advising them to furlough employees, defer rent, cut purchases and invest in online capabilities. All of them did so with abundant success. Eventually, though, the other shoe will drop, right? That is, rent payments will come due; furloughs will end, and companies will have to staff up. Meanwhile, e-commerce investment and inventory control measures are now well entrenched in how companies operate. Well, yes and no.
According to Forbes, more than 12,000 store closures resulted in 159 million square feet of emptied retail space last year.1 Yet, overall retail industry sales eclipsed $4 trillion in 2020, a staggering 7% increase over 2019, including a 44% increase in e-commerce-related revenue.2
Constant supply chain disruption marked the beginning of COVID-19-related challenges, while out-of-season inventory, particularly in the apparel industry, might have been one of the toughest hurdles of the year. Though margins are hard to quantify for the industry as a whole, by most accounts overall gross margins in 2020 were only down slightly compared with 2019.
A reasonable conclusion is that the amount of discounting that was necessary to achieve revenue growth was balanced by the cost efficiencies of operating a new hybrid business model as the shutdown turned into the new normal. Many believe this new way of operating is sustainable as long as companies maintain the disciplined buying behaviors and cost controls that the past year necessitated.
With respect to personnel, one report I read suggested less than 40% of furloughed workers were expected to regain their positions. I think that figure is impacted by the inclusion of industries that have yet to recover close to the levels as some retail subsectors, such as restaurants.
While over 300,0003 of the nearly 2 million retail industry workers who were furloughed happened in a single day in March 2020, reports emerged throughout the year of others adding to their headcount. The jury remains out on whether retailers can sustain smaller workforces compared to pre-pandemic levels, or if many furloughed workers migrated to other industries or even within retail to companies more diversified than a bricks-and-mortar only offering.4
Moving forward
I don’t know if it’s possible to draw conclusions about the sustainability of this positive information flow. Could revenue increases in 2020 be a direct result of consumers spending discretionary income on things other than travel and entertainment? Could margin enhancement be entirely due to restructuring or deferred payments of leases or reduced personnel costs? Both are possible.
What is certain is that the world since March 2020 taught many companies in the retail industry how to be patient, where to invest dollars that make the most sense, how to balance staffing needs, where the customer prefers to shop and how to market to them, and how to stock the right products on the shelves, either physically or virtually.
Those are all valuable lessons not just for surviving the economic effects of the pandemic, but for operating as a leaner, more agile business as the industry moves toward a new normal.
1 Forbes
What to Read Next.
Did COVID Actually Save Retail?
Simeon Siegel, CFA | September 22, 2020 | Retail And Wholesale Distribution, Addressing Covid 19
As retailers choose which stores to open, rather than close, on the heels of the COVID-19 outbreak, they face a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to fli…
Continue Reading>More Insights
Tell us three simple things to
customize your experience.
Contact Us
Banking products are subject to approval and are provided in the United States by BMO Bank N.A. Member FDIC. BMO Commercial Bank is a trade name used in the United States by BMO Bank N.A. Member FDIC. BMO Sponsor Finance is a trade name used by BMO Financial Corp. and its affiliates.
Please note important disclosures for content produced by BMO Capital Markets. BMO Capital Markets Regulatory | BMOCMC Fixed Income Commentary Disclosure | BMOCMC FICC Macro Strategy Commentary Disclosure | Research Disclosure Statements.
BMO Capital Markets is a trade name used by BMO Financial Group for the wholesale banking businesses of Bank of Montreal, BMO Bank N.A. (member FDIC), Bank of Montreal Europe p.l.c., and Bank of Montreal (China) Co. Ltd, the institutional broker dealer business of BMO Capital Markets Corp. (Member FINRA and SIPC) and the agency broker dealer business of Clearpool Execution Services, LLC (Member FINRA and SIPC) in the U.S. , and the institutional broker dealer businesses of BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc. (Member Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization and Member Canadian Investor Protection Fund) in Canada and Asia, Bank of Montreal Europe p.l.c. (authorised and regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland) in Europe and BMO Capital Markets Limited (authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority) in the UK and Australia and carbon credit origination, sustainability advisory services and environmental solutions provided by Bank of Montreal, BMO Radicle Inc., and Carbon Farmers Australia Pty Ltd. (ACN 136 799 221 AFSL 430135) in Australia. "Nesbitt Burns" is a registered trademark of BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc, used under license. "BMO Capital Markets" is a trademark of Bank of Montreal, used under license. "BMO (M-Bar roundel symbol)" is a registered trademark of Bank of Montreal, used under license.
® Registered trademark of Bank of Montreal in the United States, Canada and elsewhere.
™ Trademark of Bank of Montreal in the United States and Canada.
The material contained in articles posted on this website is intended as a general market commentary. The opinions, estimates and projections, if any, contained in these articles are those of the authors and may differ from those of other BMO Commercial Bank employees and affiliates. BMO Commercial Bank endeavors to ensure that the contents have been compiled or derived from sources that it believes to be reliable and which it believes contain information and opinions which are accurate and complete. However, the authors and BMO Commercial Bank take no responsibility for any errors or omissions and do not guarantee their accuracy or completeness. These articles are for informational purposes only.
This information is not intended to be tax or legal advice. This information cannot be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer. This information is being used to support the promotion or marketing of the planning strategies discussed herein. BMO Bank N.A. and its affiliates do not provide legal or tax advice to clients. You should review your particular circumstances with your independent legal and tax advisors.
Third party web sites may have privacy and security policies different from BMO. Links to other web sites do not imply the endorsement or approval of such web sites. Please review the privacy and security policies of web sites reached through links from BMO web sites.
Notice to Customers
To help the government fight the funding of terrorism and money laundering activities, federal law (USA Patriot Act (Title III of Pub. L. 107 56 (signed into law October 26, 2001)) requires all financial organizations to obtain, verify and record information that identifies each person who opens an account. When you open an account, we will ask for your name, address, date of birth and other information that will allow us to identify you. We may also ask you to provide a copy of your driver's license or other identifying documents. For each business or entity that opens an account, we will ask for your name, address and other information that will allow us to identify the entity. We may also ask you to provide a copy of your certificate of incorporation (or similar document) or other identifying documents. The information you provide in this form may be used to perform a credit check and verify your identity by using internal sources and third-party vendors. If the requested information is not provided within 30 calendar days, the account will be subject to closure.