Steel Firms Look to Capitalize on Tariffs—While They Can
-
bookmark
-
print
- Keywords:
- tariffs
- steel
- steel prices
When I attended the annual Steel Success Strategies conference a few years ago, U.S. companies were fretting over low steel prices due to a glut of underpriced foreign imports. How times have changed. At this year’s conference, domestic concerns were buzzing about higher steel prices, which have largely been driven by tariffs.
In the short run, U.S. steel companies are in an excellent position. But the industry knows this is a temporary situation, and they’re exploring how to position themselves for the long term.
Good news, bad news
Tariffs from both trade cases and Section 232 tariffs/quotas on all steel imports, implemented through the World Trade Organization (“WTO”) during the Obama administration in 2016 and the implementation of Section 232 tariffs under President Donald Trump in April 2018, have sent steel prices skyrocketing over the past few years, and resulted in a protectionist environment in the steel industry. For example, in 2015, hot-rolled coil steel prices hit a low of $350 per ton. After hitting a multi-year high of $935 in June, prices gradually declined. The same effect has been realized on cold–rolled steel, galvanized steel and other steel products.
But higher prices are a double-edged sword. On the one hand, being able to charge higher prices means both increased profits and improved gross margins for domestic steel producers. Nucor, the largest U.S. steel producer, more than doubled its second quarter earnings from the same period last year. During 2018, some of the leading domestic steel companies experienced record profits, with tariffsbeing cited as one of the main factors. With strong earnings and cash flows, producers can reinvest in their businesses (i.e. purchase new equipment or expand operations), pay down debt, or become acquisitive. In addition, we’re seeing foreign companies invest in or expand into the U.S. market, which is creating jobs and gradually increasing the supply produced domestically. Many more foreign steel companies are exploring entrance into the U.S. market for fear they will be shut out of the U.S. steel market. The expansion of steel production in the U.S. is a long process that requires significant capital investment and time. However, the expansion has begun and should continue as long as tariffs or quotas remain in effect.
For companies that purchase steel, however, higher prices are a burden. Car manufacturers, for example, cannot pass all the costs of higher raw materials along to their customers and still remain competitive with foreign entities that are importing a finished product (which are not subject to import tariffs).
The long-term risk is that some companies will move some of their operations overseas as Harley-Davidson announced it would do earlier this year. Another option for users of steel is to expand operations overseas and ship a finished product to the U.S. to avoid tariffs. Right now, steel customers are waiting to see how the situation shakes out as many do not believe tariffs will remain in place for an extended period of time.
Preparing for a post-tariff world
Ultimately, steel companies know these tariffs will be temporary, particularly the ones Trump levied against Mexico, Canada and the EU under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act. That’s why they’re trying to maximize profits while they can. Based on what we’re seeing in the market:
- M&A activity has increased, as some companies explore selling while EBITDA levels are high, while others are considering acquisitions as a way to grow and expand.
- Many companies are taking the opportunity to hunker down and improve their operations so they can produce or distribute steel at a lower cost domestically, by investing in new equipment, as an example.
- Some companies that were overleveraged are paying down debt to improve their balance sheets.
Because the U.S. doesn’t produce as much metal as it consumes, there’s still raw material coming into the U.S., albeit at higher prices. Thanks to strength in the U.S. economy, demand for steel remains strong, so steel prices are holding firm.
On the other hand, the uncertainty of situation has made some overseas-based steel companies reluctant to ship steel to the U.S. That trepidation in the global market could adversely affect supply and demand. Long-term, more foreign companies entering the U.S. market means increased competition, which will drive prices lower.
With steel prices at near record levels, at some point, there’s going to be a ripple effect on the end market, which could lead to a drop in demand. Auto companies, for example, may decide to ship more finished product into the U.S.
These developments will probably happen gradually. For the next six months, we believe prices will likely remain flat to slightly lower. But at the end of the day, end customers will struggle with higher steel prices. A domestic car manufacturer is not going to continue to pay $900 a ton indefinitely.
That’s why steel companies aren’t just standing pat; they’re developing strategies that will allow them to thrive when the tariffs—and their related benefits—disappear.
Andrew Pappas
Managing Director, Team Leader and Head of ABL Metals Group
312-636-3519
Andrew is a Managing Director / Team Leader and Head of Asset Based Lending (ABL) Metals within the ABL Group of BMO Commercial Bank since 2011. Currently, Andrew o…(..)
View Full Profile >When I attended the annual Steel Success Strategies conference a few years ago, U.S. companies were fretting over low steel prices due to a glut of underpriced foreign imports. How times have changed. At this year’s conference, domestic concerns were buzzing about higher steel prices, which have largely been driven by tariffs.
In the short run, U.S. steel companies are in an excellent position. But the industry knows this is a temporary situation, and they’re exploring how to position themselves for the long term.
Good news, bad news
Tariffs from both trade cases and Section 232 tariffs/quotas on all steel imports, implemented through the World Trade Organization (“WTO”) during the Obama administration in 2016 and the implementation of Section 232 tariffs under President Donald Trump in April 2018, have sent steel prices skyrocketing over the past few years, and resulted in a protectionist environment in the steel industry. For example, in 2015, hot-rolled coil steel prices hit a low of $350 per ton. After hitting a multi-year high of $935 in June, prices gradually declined. The same effect has been realized on cold–rolled steel, galvanized steel and other steel products.
But higher prices are a double-edged sword. On the one hand, being able to charge higher prices means both increased profits and improved gross margins for domestic steel producers. Nucor, the largest U.S. steel producer, more than doubled its second quarter earnings from the same period last year. During 2018, some of the leading domestic steel companies experienced record profits, with tariffsbeing cited as one of the main factors. With strong earnings and cash flows, producers can reinvest in their businesses (i.e. purchase new equipment or expand operations), pay down debt, or become acquisitive. In addition, we’re seeing foreign companies invest in or expand into the U.S. market, which is creating jobs and gradually increasing the supply produced domestically. Many more foreign steel companies are exploring entrance into the U.S. market for fear they will be shut out of the U.S. steel market. The expansion of steel production in the U.S. is a long process that requires significant capital investment and time. However, the expansion has begun and should continue as long as tariffs or quotas remain in effect.
For companies that purchase steel, however, higher prices are a burden. Car manufacturers, for example, cannot pass all the costs of higher raw materials along to their customers and still remain competitive with foreign entities that are importing a finished product (which are not subject to import tariffs).
The long-term risk is that some companies will move some of their operations overseas as Harley-Davidson announced it would do earlier this year. Another option for users of steel is to expand operations overseas and ship a finished product to the U.S. to avoid tariffs. Right now, steel customers are waiting to see how the situation shakes out as many do not believe tariffs will remain in place for an extended period of time.
Preparing for a post-tariff world
Ultimately, steel companies know these tariffs will be temporary, particularly the ones Trump levied against Mexico, Canada and the EU under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act. That’s why they’re trying to maximize profits while they can. Based on what we’re seeing in the market:
- M&A activity has increased, as some companies explore selling while EBITDA levels are high, while others are considering acquisitions as a way to grow and expand.
- Many companies are taking the opportunity to hunker down and improve their operations so they can produce or distribute steel at a lower cost domestically, by investing in new equipment, as an example.
- Some companies that were overleveraged are paying down debt to improve their balance sheets.
Because the U.S. doesn’t produce as much metal as it consumes, there’s still raw material coming into the U.S., albeit at higher prices. Thanks to strength in the U.S. economy, demand for steel remains strong, so steel prices are holding firm.
On the other hand, the uncertainty of situation has made some overseas-based steel companies reluctant to ship steel to the U.S. That trepidation in the global market could adversely affect supply and demand. Long-term, more foreign companies entering the U.S. market means increased competition, which will drive prices lower.
With steel prices at near record levels, at some point, there’s going to be a ripple effect on the end market, which could lead to a drop in demand. Auto companies, for example, may decide to ship more finished product into the U.S.
These developments will probably happen gradually. For the next six months, we believe prices will likely remain flat to slightly lower. But at the end of the day, end customers will struggle with higher steel prices. A domestic car manufacturer is not going to continue to pay $900 a ton indefinitely.
That’s why steel companies aren’t just standing pat; they’re developing strategies that will allow them to thrive when the tariffs—and their related benefits—disappear.
What to Read Next.
Global Commodities in 2021: China, Protectionism and Green Stimulus
Andrew Pappas | December 18, 2020 | Metals
For all the ups and downs of the commodities markets over the years, there's never been a year quite like this. To get a perspective…
Continue Reading>More Insights
Tell us three simple things to
customize your experience.
Contact Us
Banking products are subject to approval and are provided in the United States by BMO Bank N.A. Member FDIC. BMO Commercial Bank is a trade name used in the United States by BMO Bank N.A. Member FDIC. BMO Sponsor Finance is a trade name used by BMO Financial Corp. and its affiliates.
Please note important disclosures for content produced by BMO Capital Markets. BMO Capital Markets Regulatory | BMOCMC Fixed Income Commentary Disclosure | BMOCMC FICC Macro Strategy Commentary Disclosure | Research Disclosure Statements.
BMO Capital Markets is a trade name used by BMO Financial Group for the wholesale banking businesses of Bank of Montreal, BMO Bank N.A. (member FDIC), Bank of Montreal Europe p.l.c., and Bank of Montreal (China) Co. Ltd, the institutional broker dealer business of BMO Capital Markets Corp. (Member FINRA and SIPC) and the agency broker dealer business of Clearpool Execution Services, LLC (Member FINRA and SIPC) in the U.S. , and the institutional broker dealer businesses of BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc. (Member Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization and Member Canadian Investor Protection Fund) in Canada and Asia, Bank of Montreal Europe p.l.c. (authorised and regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland) in Europe and BMO Capital Markets Limited (authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority) in the UK and Australia and carbon credit origination, sustainability advisory services and environmental solutions provided by Bank of Montreal, BMO Radicle Inc., and Carbon Farmers Australia Pty Ltd. (ACN 136 799 221 AFSL 430135) in Australia. "Nesbitt Burns" is a registered trademark of BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc, used under license. "BMO Capital Markets" is a trademark of Bank of Montreal, used under license. "BMO (M-Bar roundel symbol)" is a registered trademark of Bank of Montreal, used under license.
® Registered trademark of Bank of Montreal in the United States, Canada and elsewhere.
™ Trademark of Bank of Montreal in the United States and Canada.
The material contained in articles posted on this website is intended as a general market commentary. The opinions, estimates and projections, if any, contained in these articles are those of the authors and may differ from those of other BMO Commercial Bank employees and affiliates. BMO Commercial Bank endeavors to ensure that the contents have been compiled or derived from sources that it believes to be reliable and which it believes contain information and opinions which are accurate and complete. However, the authors and BMO Commercial Bank take no responsibility for any errors or omissions and do not guarantee their accuracy or completeness. These articles are for informational purposes only.
This information is not intended to be tax or legal advice. This information cannot be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer. This information is being used to support the promotion or marketing of the planning strategies discussed herein. BMO Bank N.A. and its affiliates do not provide legal or tax advice to clients. You should review your particular circumstances with your independent legal and tax advisors.
Third party web sites may have privacy and security policies different from BMO. Links to other web sites do not imply the endorsement or approval of such web sites. Please review the privacy and security policies of web sites reached through links from BMO web sites.
Notice to Customers
To help the government fight the funding of terrorism and money laundering activities, federal law (USA Patriot Act (Title III of Pub. L. 107 56 (signed into law October 26, 2001)) requires all financial organizations to obtain, verify and record information that identifies each person who opens an account. When you open an account, we will ask for your name, address, date of birth and other information that will allow us to identify you. We may also ask you to provide a copy of your driver's license or other identifying documents. For each business or entity that opens an account, we will ask for your name, address and other information that will allow us to identify the entity. We may also ask you to provide a copy of your certificate of incorporation (or similar document) or other identifying documents. The information you provide in this form may be used to perform a credit check and verify your identity by using internal sources and third-party vendors. If the requested information is not provided within 30 calendar days, the account will be subject to closure.