Laboring to Find Workers
-
bookmark
-
print
- Keywords:
- talent
The Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) showed a record-high 9.2 million U.S. job vacancies in May, only slightly higher than April’s reading, suggesting that unfilled positions are starting to stabilize after surging to start the year. Indeed, the NFIB’s survey showed the share of small businesses with job openings at 46% in June, down from 48% in May, but still representing the two highest readings on record. (The NFIB’s poll commenced in 1973, much earlier than the JOLTS’ start in 2000.) After payrolls expanded by 1.4 million in the past two months alone, the fact that these metrics are only starting to stabilize, and around record highs, is a testament to the underlying strength of labor demand and the sluggishness of the supply response.
Finding employees has become problematic despite what seems to be a more than adequate number of available workers. In June, there were 9.5 million persons officially classified as unemployed, meaning they were actively (albeit not necessarily aggressively) looking for a job. According to ZipRecruiter, most states have now reinstated their work search requirements to be eligible to receive unemployment insurance (UI) benefits, after relaxing them because of the pandemic. Nevertheless, the NFIB survey showed that 56% of firms had few or no qualified applicants for their job openings, barely down from 57% in May and matching the two highest readings on record (since 1993). There’s obviously more than just a skills mismatch problem at play here.
Meanwhile, the labor force participation rate was 61.6% in June, having been stuck in the 61.4%-to-61.7% range for the past year. It was 63.3% immediately before the pandemic. Indeed, there are currently 3.8 million fewer persons in the labor force compared to February 2020 (not seasonally adjusted), with 1.6 million saying they are not engaged in the labor market specifically because of the pandemic. Among the 3.8 million, 1.9 million (50%) currently want a job, but they haven’t searched for one in the past four weeks (so they aren’t counted as unemployed or in the labor force).
The remainder reflects individuals, for example, who have retired or opted to become a stay-at-home parent. Among the 1.6 million specifically citing the pandemic, 638,000 (40%) currently want a job.
There are lots of individuals wanting to work, but not actively searching for a job; or looking for one, but not urgently. A recent survey by Indeed showed that more than 70% of job seekers were not actively looking (they were searching only passively or not at all), with 10% looking both actively and urgently, and slightly more than 10% searching actively but not urgently. The reasons respondents gave for not being urgent in their job search were
- COVID-19 health and safety concerns (~25%)
- Having a spouse employed (>20%)
- Having a financial cushion (~20%)
- Having care responsibilities (<20%)
- Enhanced UI benefits (~10%)
The two lowest-ranked reasons appear at odds with what the media (and some politicians) are saying in terms of them being among the top three factors for reduced labor market engagement, along with COVID concerns. However, this was an online survey (easier to be untruthful?) and Indeed’s clientele could be causing a sample selection bias. Jobs requiring low skills and paying minimum wages, along with those individuals searching for them, might not be that prevalent on Indeed’s platform.
In any event, the anecdotal evidence suggests that enhanced UI benefits dampen labor market engagement for potential minimum-wage and other lower-wage earners. This compelled 25 states to announce plans to exit the federal programs earlier than their September expiries. Looking at the latest UI claims figures, it’s too early to determine whether states halting the federal programs are broadly seeing a relatively larger fall in beneficiaries than the non-halting states, although the very preliminary evidence is pointing in that direction.
As the summer unfolds, several factors are likely to prod a more active job search, and a better supply response to the strong demand for labor. Increased vaccination rates, the start of the school year, the end of UI benefits and savings running out were all critical factors cited in the Indeed survey. However, the most important factor mentioned was more job opportunities, which we take to mean higher wages, given job openings are already running at record highs. Although lower-wage jobs have been dominating recent payroll employment gains, average hourly earnings growth has picked up. In June, it was 3.6% y/y or a 5.9% annualized rate over the latest three months alone. However, the Atlanta Fed’s Wage Growth Tracker came in at 3.4% y/y for June (3-month average, weighted), still well within its recent 3.3%-to-3.7% range. We suspect the evidence of wage acceleration is also going to become more compelling as the summer unfolds… along with the next few seasons.
Michael Gregory, CFA
Deputy Chief Economist & Managing Director
800-613-0205
Michael is part of the team responsible for forecasting and analyzing the North American economy and financial markets. He has spent his career working in either ec…(..)
View Full Profile >The Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) showed a record-high 9.2 million U.S. job vacancies in May, only slightly higher than April’s reading, suggesting that unfilled positions are starting to stabilize after surging to start the year. Indeed, the NFIB’s survey showed the share of small businesses with job openings at 46% in June, down from 48% in May, but still representing the two highest readings on record. (The NFIB’s poll commenced in 1973, much earlier than the JOLTS’ start in 2000.) After payrolls expanded by 1.4 million in the past two months alone, the fact that these metrics are only starting to stabilize, and around record highs, is a testament to the underlying strength of labor demand and the sluggishness of the supply response.
Finding employees has become problematic despite what seems to be a more than adequate number of available workers. In June, there were 9.5 million persons officially classified as unemployed, meaning they were actively (albeit not necessarily aggressively) looking for a job. According to ZipRecruiter, most states have now reinstated their work search requirements to be eligible to receive unemployment insurance (UI) benefits, after relaxing them because of the pandemic. Nevertheless, the NFIB survey showed that 56% of firms had few or no qualified applicants for their job openings, barely down from 57% in May and matching the two highest readings on record (since 1993). There’s obviously more than just a skills mismatch problem at play here.
Meanwhile, the labor force participation rate was 61.6% in June, having been stuck in the 61.4%-to-61.7% range for the past year. It was 63.3% immediately before the pandemic. Indeed, there are currently 3.8 million fewer persons in the labor force compared to February 2020 (not seasonally adjusted), with 1.6 million saying they are not engaged in the labor market specifically because of the pandemic. Among the 3.8 million, 1.9 million (50%) currently want a job, but they haven’t searched for one in the past four weeks (so they aren’t counted as unemployed or in the labor force).
The remainder reflects individuals, for example, who have retired or opted to become a stay-at-home parent. Among the 1.6 million specifically citing the pandemic, 638,000 (40%) currently want a job.
There are lots of individuals wanting to work, but not actively searching for a job; or looking for one, but not urgently. A recent survey by Indeed showed that more than 70% of job seekers were not actively looking (they were searching only passively or not at all), with 10% looking both actively and urgently, and slightly more than 10% searching actively but not urgently. The reasons respondents gave for not being urgent in their job search were
- COVID-19 health and safety concerns (~25%)
- Having a spouse employed (>20%)
- Having a financial cushion (~20%)
- Having care responsibilities (<20%)
- Enhanced UI benefits (~10%)
The two lowest-ranked reasons appear at odds with what the media (and some politicians) are saying in terms of them being among the top three factors for reduced labor market engagement, along with COVID concerns. However, this was an online survey (easier to be untruthful?) and Indeed’s clientele could be causing a sample selection bias. Jobs requiring low skills and paying minimum wages, along with those individuals searching for them, might not be that prevalent on Indeed’s platform.
In any event, the anecdotal evidence suggests that enhanced UI benefits dampen labor market engagement for potential minimum-wage and other lower-wage earners. This compelled 25 states to announce plans to exit the federal programs earlier than their September expiries. Looking at the latest UI claims figures, it’s too early to determine whether states halting the federal programs are broadly seeing a relatively larger fall in beneficiaries than the non-halting states, although the very preliminary evidence is pointing in that direction.
As the summer unfolds, several factors are likely to prod a more active job search, and a better supply response to the strong demand for labor. Increased vaccination rates, the start of the school year, the end of UI benefits and savings running out were all critical factors cited in the Indeed survey. However, the most important factor mentioned was more job opportunities, which we take to mean higher wages, given job openings are already running at record highs. Although lower-wage jobs have been dominating recent payroll employment gains, average hourly earnings growth has picked up. In June, it was 3.6% y/y or a 5.9% annualized rate over the latest three months alone. However, the Atlanta Fed’s Wage Growth Tracker came in at 3.4% y/y for June (3-month average, weighted), still well within its recent 3.3%-to-3.7% range. We suspect the evidence of wage acceleration is also going to become more compelling as the summer unfolds… along with the next few seasons.
What to Read Next.
IN Tune Podcast: 2021 Mid-Year Update
Brian Belski | July 16, 2021 | Economic Insights
As equity markets head into the second half of 2021, the following podcast provides an update on our forecasts for both the US and Canadian stock mar…
Continue Reading>More Insights
Tell us three simple things to
customize your experience.
Contact Us
Banking products are subject to approval and are provided in the United States by BMO Bank N.A. Member FDIC. BMO Commercial Bank is a trade name used in the United States by BMO Bank N.A. Member FDIC. BMO Sponsor Finance is a trade name used by BMO Financial Corp. and its affiliates.
Please note important disclosures for content produced by BMO Capital Markets. BMO Capital Markets Regulatory | BMOCMC Fixed Income Commentary Disclosure | BMOCMC FICC Macro Strategy Commentary Disclosure | Research Disclosure Statements.
BMO Capital Markets is a trade name used by BMO Financial Group for the wholesale banking businesses of Bank of Montreal, BMO Bank N.A. (member FDIC), Bank of Montreal Europe p.l.c., and Bank of Montreal (China) Co. Ltd, the institutional broker dealer business of BMO Capital Markets Corp. (Member FINRA and SIPC) and the agency broker dealer business of Clearpool Execution Services, LLC (Member FINRA and SIPC) in the U.S. , and the institutional broker dealer businesses of BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc. (Member Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization and Member Canadian Investor Protection Fund) in Canada and Asia, Bank of Montreal Europe p.l.c. (authorised and regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland) in Europe and BMO Capital Markets Limited (authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority) in the UK and Australia and carbon credit origination, sustainability advisory services and environmental solutions provided by Bank of Montreal, BMO Radicle Inc., and Carbon Farmers Australia Pty Ltd. (ACN 136 799 221 AFSL 430135) in Australia. "Nesbitt Burns" is a registered trademark of BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc, used under license. "BMO Capital Markets" is a trademark of Bank of Montreal, used under license. "BMO (M-Bar roundel symbol)" is a registered trademark of Bank of Montreal, used under license.
® Registered trademark of Bank of Montreal in the United States, Canada and elsewhere.
™ Trademark of Bank of Montreal in the United States and Canada.
The material contained in articles posted on this website is intended as a general market commentary. The opinions, estimates and projections, if any, contained in these articles are those of the authors and may differ from those of other BMO Commercial Bank employees and affiliates. BMO Commercial Bank endeavors to ensure that the contents have been compiled or derived from sources that it believes to be reliable and which it believes contain information and opinions which are accurate and complete. However, the authors and BMO Commercial Bank take no responsibility for any errors or omissions and do not guarantee their accuracy or completeness. These articles are for informational purposes only.
This information is not intended to be tax or legal advice. This information cannot be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer. This information is being used to support the promotion or marketing of the planning strategies discussed herein. BMO Bank N.A. and its affiliates do not provide legal or tax advice to clients. You should review your particular circumstances with your independent legal and tax advisors.
Third party web sites may have privacy and security policies different from BMO. Links to other web sites do not imply the endorsement or approval of such web sites. Please review the privacy and security policies of web sites reached through links from BMO web sites.
Notice to Customers
To help the government fight the funding of terrorism and money laundering activities, federal law (USA Patriot Act (Title III of Pub. L. 107 56 (signed into law October 26, 2001)) requires all financial organizations to obtain, verify and record information that identifies each person who opens an account. When you open an account, we will ask for your name, address, date of birth and other information that will allow us to identify you. We may also ask you to provide a copy of your driver's license or other identifying documents. For each business or entity that opens an account, we will ask for your name, address and other information that will allow us to identify the entity. We may also ask you to provide a copy of your certificate of incorporation (or similar document) or other identifying documents. The information you provide in this form may be used to perform a credit check and verify your identity by using internal sources and third-party vendors. If the requested information is not provided within 30 calendar days, the account will be subject to closure.